{"id":21812,"date":"2025-09-01T10:58:55","date_gmt":"2025-09-01T10:58:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.encomfast.com\/?post_type=solutions&p=21812"},"modified":"2026-05-08T03:49:39","modified_gmt":"2026-05-08T03:49:39","slug":"station-interior-coverage-solution","status":"publish","type":"solutions","link":"https:\/\/www.encomfast.com\/ko\/solutions\/station-interior-coverage-solution\/","title":{"rendered":"Station Interior Coverage Solution"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Project Central Gateway Terminal: Station Interior Coverage Solution for a Major Transit Hub in Chicago<\/span><\/h1>\n

Contractor Team Introduction<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

We are a Shenzhen based WiFi engineering contractor with extensive experience in transportation facilities, public buildings, commercial venues, hospitality properties, outdoor wireless transmission, and high traffic public WiFi environments. Our team has completed wireless coverage projects for railway stations, bus terminals, airport waiting areas, ferry terminals, shopping centers, hotels, government service halls, warehouses, and outdoor surveillance transmission sites.<\/span><\/p>\n

Station interior WiFi is different from ordinary office WiFi. A transit hub has passenger concentration, high ceilings, metal structures, glass partitions, ticketing equipment, security devices, staff handheld terminals, retail tenants, surveillance cameras, public information systems, and long corridors. A successful station project must support both passenger access and operational systems without allowing guest traffic to affect business critical devices.<\/span><\/p>\n

Our team has used COMFAST equipment in many indoor coverage and wireless transmission projects. From our field experience, COMFAST gateways, WiFi 6 routers, in wall APs, ceiling APs, paired wireless bridges, and PoE switches provide a practical balance of performance, installation flexibility, clean deployment, and long term maintainability. For this station project, we selected COMFAST equipment because the customer needed reliable indoor coverage, business network separation, CCTV wireless transmission, and a network structure that the station IT team could maintain after handover.<\/span><\/p>\n

This case documents our Station Interior Coverage Solution for Central Gateway Terminal in Chicago. The project covered the entrance hall, ticketing area, automatic ticket machines, security check area, waiting hall, transfer corridor, platform waiting area, service counter, station office, staff rest area, retail shop area, underground passage, elevator lobby, stairwell entrances, CCTV points, and management equipment room.<\/span><\/p>\n

1. Project Overview<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Basic Project Information<\/span><\/h2>\n

Project Name: Project Central Gateway Terminal<\/span><\/p>\n

Project Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA<\/span><\/p>\n

Facility Type: Urban rail and bus transfer station<\/span><\/p>\n

Interior Coverage Area: Approximately 38,000 square feet<\/span><\/p>\n

Average Daily Passenger Flow: About 18,000 passengers<\/span><\/p>\n

Peak Hour Passenger Flow: About 3,200 passengers<\/span><\/p>\n

Project Type: Station Interior Coverage Solution with passenger WiFi, staff network, ticketing network, security network, camera network, and management network separation<\/span><\/p>\n

Project Cycle: Five weeks from survey to final acceptance<\/span><\/p>\n

Construction Window: Late evening and low traffic hours to avoid disruption to station operation<\/span><\/p>\n

The station operations team contacted us after repeated complaints about unstable WiFi in the waiting hall, weak signal in the underground passage, dropped staff handheld terminal connections, and unreliable camera transmission in several remote corners of the facility. The existing network had grown over time without a unified design. Our task was to rebuild the station interior network into a clean, segmented, and professionally documented wireless system.<\/span><\/p>\n

2. Customer Pain Points Before the Project<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Passenger WiFi Was Unstable During Peak Hours<\/span><\/h2>\n

The waiting hall had a large number of passengers connecting at the same time during morning and evening rush hours. The old network could handle light traffic during quiet periods, but when hundreds of passengers tried to connect, the WiFi became slow and unstable. Passengers experienced failed connections, delayed loading, and poor roaming between the entrance hall and waiting hall.<\/span><\/p>\n

Ticketing and Security Devices Were Affected by General Traffic<\/span><\/h2>\n

Some ticketing terminals and security check devices were connected through the same network environment as staff and public WiFi devices. When passenger traffic increased, business devices became less stable. Ticket validation and device status updates occasionally slowed down, creating pressure for the station operations team.<\/span><\/p>\n

Underground Passage and Transfer Corridor Had Weak Signal<\/span><\/h2>\n

The underground passage had thick concrete walls, long narrow walking paths, and several turns. The existing APs in the main hall could not provide reliable signal into this area. The transfer corridor also had weak signal at both ends and unstable roaming in the middle section.<\/span><\/p>\n

Station Staff Handheld Terminals Dropped Connection<\/span><\/h2>\n

Station staff used handheld terminals for ticket assistance, passenger service, inspection records, and internal communication. These terminals moved between the service counter, waiting hall, platform access area, and staff office. The original WiFi design did not support smooth roaming, so devices sometimes held onto a weak AP signal instead of switching properly.<\/span><\/p>\n

Remote CCTV Points Were Difficult to Cable<\/span><\/h2>\n

Several camera locations near the underground passage entrance and remote platform waiting zone were difficult to cable without opening finished surfaces or interrupting station operation. The customer wanted stable video transmission without large scale construction.<\/span><\/p>\n

All Networks Were Poorly Separated<\/span><\/h2>\n

Passenger WiFi, staff devices, ticketing devices, retail tenant devices, cameras, and management equipment were not clearly separated. This made troubleshooting difficult and increased security risk. The station needed a structured network design with clear device groups and policies.<\/span><\/p>\n

3. Customer Requirements<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Confirmed Requirements from Station Operations<\/span><\/h2>\n

Stable passenger WiFi coverage across the main station interior.<\/span><\/p>\n

Reliable coverage in the entrance hall, ticketing area, security check area, waiting hall, transfer corridor, underground passage, and platform waiting area.<\/span><\/p>\n

Separate passenger WiFi, ticketing and security network, staff network, camera network, retail tenant access, and management network.<\/span><\/p>\n

Stable connectivity for staff handheld terminals while moving through the station.<\/span><\/p>\n

Priority protection for ticketing terminals and security devices.<\/span><\/p>\n

Wireless bridge transmission for CCTV locations where new cabling was not practical.<\/span><\/p>\n

PoE powered AP deployment to reduce local power adapters and simplify maintenance.<\/span><\/p>\n

Clean installation without disrupting normal station operation.<\/span><\/p>\n

Final documentation, port labeling, AP location records, and IT handover training.<\/span><\/p>\n

4. COMFAST Equipment Used in This Project<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

CF-AC300Full Gigabit Gateway<\/span><\/h2>\n

The CF-AC300 was used as the central gateway. It handled internet access, DHCP assignment, passenger WiFi policy, ticketing and security network policy, staff network policy, camera network planning, and management access. For a station project, the gateway must keep business critical systems protected from general passenger traffic.<\/span><\/p>\n

CF-WR665AX\u00a0 WiFi 6 Dual Band Router<\/span><\/h2>\n

The CF-WR665AX\u00a0 was used for the office and management zone. It provided WiFi 6 dual band coverage for station administration, IT maintenance access, and the equipment room area.<\/span><\/p>\n

CF-E593AX In Wall AP<\/span><\/h2>\n

The CF-E593AX in wall AP was used in service counters, office rooms, staff rest areas, retail wall zones, and equipment rooms. This model allowed us to provide clean room level coverage in areas where ceiling mounting was not ideal.<\/span><\/p>\n

CF-E395AX Ceiling AP<\/span><\/h2>\n

The CF-E395AX ceiling AP was used in the entrance hall, ticketing area, security check area, waiting hall, transfer corridor, platform waiting area, underground passage, elevator lobby, and stairwell entrance zones. Ceiling AP placement was suitable for broad indoor station coverage.<\/span><\/p>\n

CF-E112N V2 Paired Wireless Bridge<\/span><\/h2>\n

The CF-E112N V2 paired wireless bridge was used for 2.4G wireless transmission for CCTV points where new Ethernet cable routes were difficult. This avoided opening finished areas and reduced impact on station operation.<\/span><\/p>\n

CF-SG1241P 24 Port Gigabit PoE Switch<\/span><\/h2>\n

The CF-SG1241P 24 port gigabit PoE switch was used to power APs and selected network devices. PoE deployment reduced wiring complexity, centralized power delivery, and made later maintenance easier for station IT staff.<\/span><\/p>\n

5. Project Topology Diagram<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Overall Network Topology<\/span><\/h2>\n
\n

\"\"<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

6. Site Survey and Troubleshooting Process<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Station Structure and RF Survey<\/span><\/h2>\n

We performed a full walkthrough of the station and tested signal behavior in every key area. The entrance hall and waiting hall had high ceilings and wide open areas. The transfer corridor was long and narrow. The underground passage had concrete walls and limited signal penetration. The platform waiting zone had metal structures and glass partitions that created reflection and attenuation.<\/span><\/p>\n

Passenger Density Evaluation<\/span><\/h2>\n

We reviewed passenger flow patterns with the operations team. Morning and evening peak hours concentrated users in the entrance hall, ticketing area, security check line, and main waiting hall. This helped us determine AP placement and avoid relying on a few high power APs to cover the entire station.<\/span><\/p>\n

Ticketing and Security Device Inspection<\/span><\/h2>\n

We inspected automatic ticket machines, service counter terminals, handheld ticketing devices, and security check network devices. These devices were treated as business critical and were separated from passenger WiFi traffic.<\/span><\/p>\n

CCTV Transmission Path Survey<\/span><\/h2>\n

Several camera locations were difficult to cable without disrupting station finishes. We checked wireless transmission paths and selected CF-E112N V2 bridge pairs for camera backhaul where wired cabling was not practical.<\/span><\/p>\n

Network Cabinet Inspection<\/span><\/h2>\n

The existing low voltage room had mixed cables and incomplete labels. We tested cable routes, verified AP drops, organized patching, and prepared the gateway and PoE switch installation layout. This work was essential for future maintenance.<\/span><\/p>\n

7. Problems Found During Implementation<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

High Ceilings Caused Uneven Coverage<\/span><\/h2>\n

The waiting hall had a high ceiling and large open space. If APs were installed only according to ceiling convenience, signal would be uneven at passenger level. We adjusted AP locations based on real measurement points and passenger seating areas.<\/span><\/p>\n

Metal Structures Created Signal Reflection<\/span><\/h2>\n

Metal beams, signage frames, ticketing equipment, and security structures created reflection and local interference. We adjusted AP power and channel planning to reduce co channel interference and prevent unstable client behavior.<\/span><\/p>\n

Underground Passage Needed Dedicated AP Coverage<\/span><\/h2>\n

The underground passage could not be covered from the main hall. We installed dedicated CF-E395AX ceiling APs along the passage and tuned power to provide stable walking coverage without unnecessary overlap.<\/span><\/p>\n

Business Devices Needed Network Separation<\/span><\/h2>\n

Ticketing, security, staff devices, retail tenants, cameras, and passenger WiFi had different stability and security needs. We separated them by policy through the gateway to prevent passenger usage from affecting station operation.<\/span><\/p>\n

Construction Had to Avoid Passenger Disruption<\/span><\/h2>\n

The station could not close during the project. We used phased installation during low traffic windows, coordinated with operations staff, and completed testing zone by zone. This reduced operational risk and kept public areas available.<\/span><\/p>\n

8. Final Engineering Solution<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Core Network Design<\/span><\/h2>\n

The CF-AC300 was installed as the central gateway. The CF-SG1241P PoE switch handled AP power and wired distribution. The CF-WR665AX covered the office and management zone. Public and business networks were separated by policy to protect station operations.<\/span><\/p>\n

Passenger Area WiFi Design<\/span><\/h2>\n

CF-E395AX ceiling APs were deployed in the entrance hall, ticketing area, security check area, waiting hall, transfer corridor, platform waiting area, and underground passage. AP locations were selected based on actual passenger positions, not only ceiling availability.<\/span><\/p>\n

Staff and Office Coverage<\/span><\/h2>\n

CF-E593AX in wall APs were installed in staff offices, service counters, staff rest areas, and retail wall zones. This provided clean local coverage without interfering with public area APs.<\/span><\/p>\n

CCTV Wireless Transmission<\/span><\/h2>\n

CF-E112N V2 paired wireless bridges were deployed for remote CCTV points. After alignment, we tested video stability, delay, and connection continuity before final acceptance.<\/span><\/p>\n

9. Different Area Network Design<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Entrance Hall Coverage<\/span><\/h2>\n

The entrance hall required stable WiFi for passenger access, staff handheld devices, and service information. Ceiling APs were placed to cover walking paths and waiting points near the main doors.<\/span><\/p>\n

Ticketing Area Coverage<\/span><\/h2>\n

The ticketing area was treated as a business critical zone. Ticketing terminals and service counter devices were separated from passenger WiFi. AP coverage was tuned to support staff movement and customer service points.<\/span><\/p>\n

Security Check Area Coverage<\/span><\/h2>\n

The security check area included scanning equipment, staff devices, and passenger queues. We planned coverage to avoid dead zones around equipment and reduced interference near metal structures.<\/span><\/p>\n

Waiting Hall Coverage<\/span><\/h2>\n

The main waiting hall required capacity and coverage. CF-E395AX ceiling APs were placed to support passenger seating zones, information screens, and walking paths. Power and channels were tuned to reduce AP overlap.<\/span><\/p>\n

Transfer Corridor and Underground Passage Coverage<\/span><\/h2>\n

The transfer corridor and underground passage were long and narrow. Dedicated ceiling APs were installed at planned intervals to support smooth roaming and avoid signal gaps in the middle sections.<\/span><\/p>\n

Platform Waiting Area Coverage<\/span><\/h2>\n

The platform waiting area had metal structures, glass barriers, and passenger movement. AP placement was adjusted after field testing to avoid unstable signal around structural elements.<\/span><\/p>\n

Retail Shop Area Coverage<\/span><\/h2>\n

Retail tenants needed stable connectivity for POS and daily business devices. Retail access was separated from passenger WiFi and staff networks, making tenant support easier.<\/span><\/p>\n

Staff Office and Management Network<\/span><\/h2>\n

Staff offices and management devices used restricted network access. The management network was used for gateway, AP, switch, and bridge maintenance, keeping system administration separate from user traffic.<\/span><\/p>\n

10. What We Did Differently from Other Engineering Teams<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

We Designed Around Station Operation<\/span><\/h2>\n

We did not simply add APs. We studied passenger flow, ticketing operations, security check movement, staff routes, retail needs, and camera transmission requirements before finalizing the design.<\/span><\/p>\n

We Protected Business Critical Networks<\/span><\/h2>\n

Passenger WiFi was separated from ticketing, security, staff, camera, retail, and management networks. This prevented public usage from affecting station systems.<\/span><\/p>\n

We Tuned the Network Instead of Using Maximum Power<\/span><\/h2>\n

High transmit power is not a professional solution in a station. We tuned channels and AP power to reduce interference, support roaming, and improve stability.<\/span><\/p>\n

We Controlled Construction Impact<\/span><\/h2>\n

We worked in low traffic windows, used phased installation, and avoided disrupting passenger flow. This was critical for a station that continued operating during the project.<\/span><\/p>\n

We Delivered a Maintainable System<\/span><\/h2>\n

We labeled every key connection, documented AP locations, recorded wireless bridge points, and trained the IT team. The final system was designed for long term maintenance, not just installation day success.<\/span><\/p>\n

11. Installation and Optimization Details<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Cable Testing and Cabinet Cleanup<\/span><\/h2>\n

We tested available cable routes, relabeled patch panel connections, and organized the low voltage room. The CF-AC101 gateway and CF-SG181P PoE switch were installed in a clean cabinet layout.<\/span><\/p>\n

AP Mounting<\/span><\/h2>\n

CF-E395AX ceiling APs were installed in public areas, corridors, and underground passage zones. CF-E593AX in wall APs were installed in office, service counter, staff, and retail areas. Each AP location was checked for coverage, safety, appearance, and maintenance access.<\/span><\/p>\n

Wireless Bridge Alignment<\/span><\/h2>\n

CF-E112N V2 bridge pairs were aligned carefully for remote CCTV transmission. We tested video feeds over time to ensure stable operation.<\/span><\/p>\n

Roaming and Load Testing<\/span><\/h2>\n

We tested walking routes from entrance hall to ticketing, ticketing to security, security to waiting hall, waiting hall to transfer corridor, and underground passage to platform waiting area. Staff handheld terminals were tested during movement to confirm stable roaming.<\/span><\/p>\n

12. Project Acceptance Results<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Final Acceptance Checklist<\/span><\/h2>\n

Entrance hall WiFi coverage test passed.<\/span><\/p>\n

Ticketing area business network test passed.<\/span><\/p>\n

Security check device network test passed.<\/span><\/p>\n

Waiting hall passenger WiFi test passed.<\/span><\/p>\n

Transfer corridor roaming test passed.<\/span><\/p>\n

Underground passage coverage test passed.<\/span><\/p>\n

Platform waiting area coverage test passed.<\/span><\/p>\n

Staff handheld terminal movement test passed.<\/span><\/p>\n

Retail tenant network access test passed.<\/span><\/p>\n

CCTV wireless bridge transmission test passed.<\/span><\/p>\n

Passenger and business network isolation test passed.<\/span><\/p>\n

Network labeling, AP location documentation, and IT handover completed.<\/span><\/p>\n

13. Customer and User Feedback<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Station Operations Manager Feedback<\/span><\/h2>\n

The station operations manager said, \u201cThe new network is much more organized than the previous setup. Passenger WiFi is stable, and our operational devices are no longer affected by public traffic.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

IT Supervisor Feedback<\/span><\/h2>\n

The IT supervisor said, \u201cThe labeling and network separation make maintenance much easier. We can now identify AP locations and device groups quickly instead of guessing.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Ticketing Staff Feedback<\/span><\/h2>\n

Ticketing staff reported that service counter devices stayed connected more consistently during busy periods, which reduced delays for passengers.<\/span><\/p>\n

Passenger Feedback<\/span><\/h2>\n

Passengers in the waiting hall reported faster connection and better stability. The underground passage and transfer corridor also became usable WiFi areas instead of dead zones.<\/span><\/p>\n

14. Project Summary<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Final Result<\/span><\/h2>\n

Project Central Gateway Terminal was a successful Station Interior Coverage Solution for a major transit hub in Chicago. The project solved passenger WiFi instability, weak underground coverage, poor corridor roaming, mixed network structure, ticketing device exposure, and remote CCTV transmission challenges.<\/span><\/p>\n

The final COMFAST solution used the CF-AC101 full gigabit gateway, CF-WR633AX V2 WiFi 6 dual band router, CF-E593AX in wall APs, CF-E395AX ceiling APs, CF-E112N V2 paired wireless bridge, and CF-SG181P 8 port gigabit PoE switch.<\/span><\/p>\n

The key value of this project was not only stronger WiFi. The real value was a structured station network that supported passengers, staff, ticketing systems, security devices, retail tenants, cameras, and management access without mixing everything into one unstable environment.<\/span><\/p>\n

15. Lessons Learned and Advice to Other Contractors<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Lessons Learned<\/span><\/h2>\n

Station WiFi must be designed around passenger flow and business device protection.<\/span><\/p>\n

High ceilings and large halls require field tested AP placement, not guesswork.<\/span><\/p>\n

Underground passages and long corridors need dedicated coverage planning.<\/span><\/p>\n

Passenger WiFi, ticketing systems, security devices, staff terminals, cameras, and management access must be separated.<\/span><\/p>\n

Wireless bridges are useful for CCTV points where new cable installation would disrupt operation.<\/span><\/p>\n

Construction planning is as important as network design in an operating station.<\/span><\/p>\n

Advice to Other Contractors<\/span><\/h2>\n

For station interior WiFi projects, do not simply increase AP quantity. Walk the passenger routes, check ticketing areas, observe waiting hall density, inspect underground passages, test platform waiting areas, and understand staff workflows before designing the network.<\/span><\/p>\n

Do not place passenger WiFi and station operation devices on the same network. A public transportation facility depends on stable business systems, and those systems must be protected from passenger traffic.<\/span><\/p>\n

A station WiFi project is complete only when passengers can connect smoothly, staff terminals remain online, ticketing devices stay stable, cameras transmit reliably, and the IT team can maintain the system confidently. That was the standard we delivered for Project Central Gateway Terminal.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n\n\t\t\n
    \n\t\t\t <\/ul>\n <\/div>","protected":false},"featured_media":21947,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"postBodyCss":"","postBodyMargin":[],"postBodyPadding":[],"postBodyBackground":{"backgroundType":"classic","gradient":""},"_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"solution-category":[288],"class_list":["post-21812","solutions","type-solutions","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","solution-category-indoor-coverage"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.encomfast.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/solutions\/21812","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.encomfast.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/solutions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.encomfast.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/solutions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.encomfast.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21947"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.encomfast.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21812"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"solution-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.encomfast.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/solution-category?post=21812"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}